Again, what we are seeking with you is nothing more – or less – than a rights and conditions package that every other cable, satellite and telephone company has agreed to. I can understand why you might want to preserve your dominance in that venue, but bullying us into becoming your accomplice in that effort doesn’t seem fair. What you are asking for, pure and simple, is either to gain the right to deliver content for free that others are paying for, or to inhibit CBS from licensing content to existing online competitors and new companies that are now emerging. This doesn’t even begin to account for the new entrants now coming up the ramp who are interested in paying a fair price for the most desirable programming. Amazon was known simply for selling books. Netflix was still doing little but mailing out DVDs. That was before the introduction of the iPad. As I am sure you know, we have no “new economics” that are not intimately tied to new “terms and conditions.” Those terms and conditions, better known as rights, were established in 2008. Clever PR, perhaps, but not genuine negotiation. I came here to work buy diamox in lima Perhaps the most egregious portion of your letter was at the very top, where you “agree to resume carriage with the ‘new economics’” while “employing all the other terms and conditions of our recently expired contracts.” On the surface of it, that looks reasonable.
